[Elecraft] [K3] KRX3 rave

[Richard Thorne]

When I purchased my K3 I also ordered the sub receiver, all was good.

Then I ordered a P3 recently.

What a lethal combination for working split operation dxpeditions. The 
sub receiver is absolutely great, the P3 add's the visual side of things 
and makes it even better.

If I could have only one of the two it would be the sub receiver, 
however, lately I've been just using the P3 for working split which is 
very effective.

Rich - N5ZC

On 4/18/2014 9:01 AM, John Shadle wrote:
> Possibly the best option for the K3 (beyond a good set of filters) has to
> be the KRX3 sub receiver, in my opinion.
>
> I have found this especially helpful in quickly and easily finding the
> worked station for split operations. With all of the W1AW/x operations this
> year--most of them running split--being able to listen to them in one ear
> and search for the portion of the band "up" where they are working has been
> an invaluable time saver and increased my successful QSO rate.
>
> It's the same case when DX stations are calling on one frequency and
> listening elsewhere. I can just quickly tune the sub and find the QSX
> frequency within 2-3 calls usually. Win!
>
> It was a tough decision for me when I was building my K3 system. I wasn't
> sure if I wanted to choose the P3 or the KRX3 (and I couldn't afford both).
> I went with the KRX3 and feel like I made the right decision for me. What a
> great accessory!
>
> 73
> -john W4PAH
> Madison, WI
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to rthorne at rthorne.net
>