[Elecraft] XG3_Signal_Source

[Ken Roberson]

Dick,

Yes , I agree , 450 khz is a better number.

73 Ken K5DNL
=================================

--- On Mon, 5/27/13, Edward Dickinson III <softblue at windstream.net> wrote:

From: Edward Dickinson III <softblue at windstream.net>
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] XG3_Signal_Source
To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net
Date: Monday, May 27, 2013, 3:14 PM

If so, is there any reason not to go to 450 khz to cover 455 khz i.f.
frequency?  Pardon me if that does not compute.

 

Dick - KA5KKT

  _____  

Elecraft,

 

I would like to request a change in the firmware that would allow me

to Edit the frequency of the 160M band to 475 khz.

( 1500 KHZ is as low as it will go at this time ).

This would make a nice signal source for transverter design

on the 630 meter band.

 

Thanks for all the nice equipment.

73 Ken K5DNL

 

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html