[Elecraft] OT: Am for aircraft communications

[Ken G Kopp]

Another -very- significant factor in the continuing use of AM for aircraft
communications is it's universal use world wide.  It's considered too
expensive and impractical to abandon on a worldwide basis.  Actually,
I feel this is of more importance than the "blending" asset.

73!

Ken - K0PP

On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Sandy <ebjr37 at charter.net> wrote:

> Nate, that is exactly the reason AM is still used for aviation.
>
> 73 Bill NZ0T (old pilot).
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Don-s-comments-on-ESSB-and-AM-tp7569294p7569345.html
> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2013.0.2890 / Virus Database: 2639/6064 - Release Date: 01/28/13
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html