[Elecraft] Maxwell's Equations.
JAMES ROGERS
w4atk at bellsouth.net
Thu Mar 10 10:06:23 EST 2011
Enough with the Maxwell Equations.... What in the world does this represent to the average K3 user? .
On Mar 10, 2011, at 8:21 AM, Tom Azlin N4ZPT wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> What was asserted in "The Maxwellians" was that Maxwell died in the
> middle of a rewrite. It did sound like there was a controversy on his
> particle (or little eddies?) form of the equations for a field approach.
> Perhaps that new version would have dropped the use of quaternions?
> Have not studied the equations since college, perhaps will go find the
> papers after I finish this history book. Thanks for the tip on locating
> the older forms.
>
> 73, tom n4zpt
>
> On 3/10/2011 1:46 AM, Kevin Rock wrote:
>> There was a group which disliked his use of quaternions so he was forced
>> to rewrite the system into other systems. Most of the work was carried
>> out by others but for him to publish he needed peer review so he caved
>> into the larger group. I am reading his original work from 1873 and
>> finding it very enlightening. Even though I have studied the
>> Heaviside-Gibb's version of the Maxwell equations many times the
>> quaternions he used in the original paper were very hard to find. Luckily
>> they are proliferating online these days.
>> Kevin. KD5ONS
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:31:18 -0800, David Cutter<d.cutter at ntlworld.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I don't recall that from his biography, I'll have to read it again.
>>> Interesting.
>>>
>>> David
>>> G3UNA
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi Kevin,
>>>>
>>>> Was not Maxwell that condensed the hard to understand original theory.
>>>> Was some his disciples, aka "The Maxwellians," that finished the theory
>>>> in the present form. FitzGerald, Lodge, and Heavyside plus others.
>>>>
>>>> Am just now reading "The Maxwellians" that has this story.
>>>>
>>>> 73, tom n4zpt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 3/6/2011 5:37 PM, Kevin Rock wrote:
>>>>> I have always wondered how he condensed the original twenty equations
>>>>> in
>>>>> twenty unknowns down to just four of them. The quaternions he used
>>>>> initially were out a favor with the physics community of the day so he
>>>>> needed to get them into vector form. Heaviside did a good job but how
>>>>> do
>>>>> you characterize a system with twenty unknowns in four equations? What
>>>>> has been lost in the translation?
>>>>> Kevin. KD5ONS
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
JIM ROGERS, W4ATK
w4atk at bellsouth.net
http://web.me.com/jimrogers_w4atk
K3/100 P3
K2/10
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list