[Elecraft] KPA-500 vs THP

[k4tmc at aol.com]

 A lot of us want the KAT500 as a remote matching unit that can be used near the antenna versus a shack-bound unit.

73,
Henry - K4TMC
 

 


 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Johnny Siu <vr2xmc at yahoo.com.hk>
To: Igor Sokolov <ua9cdc at gmail.com>; Phil Hystad <phystad at mac.com>
Cc: Wes Stewart <n7ws at yahoo.com>; Elecraft <elecraft at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tue, Jan 25, 2011 8:31 am
Subject: [Elecraft] KPA-500 vs THP


Hello Igor,



Really have no idea about KAT500.  Same as you, I would like KPA500+KAT500 in 

one box.  This arrangement will give better transportation convenience.

 cheers, 





Johnny VR2XMC 









________________________________

寄件人﹕ Igor Sokolov <ua9cdc at gmail.com>

收件人﹕ Johnny Siu <vr2xmc at yahoo.com.hk>; Phil Hystad <phystad at mac.com>

副本(CC) Wes Stewart <n7ws at yahoo.com>; Elecraft <elecraft at mailman.qth.net>

傳送日期﹕ 2011/1/25 (二) 8:47:23 PM

主題： Re: [Elecraft] Re： KPA-500 vs THP



> Yes, good exercise. Except ICPW1, all the prices are WITHOUT antenna tuning

> unit.

> 

> Based on that, the price per watt for SPE is say $3.9 per watt but with 

>built-in

> ATU. THP will be sure out of my consideration.

> 

> 

> cheers,

> 

> 

> Johnny VR2XMC



In addition SPE understands any make of TRCVR not only Icom. What I specially 

like is that the amp follows TX frequency getting the information from CAT 

system but then it dowble checks it with own RF sense and frequency counter 

before switchin to TX.

I just wonder if KAT-500 is going to be integrated into KPA500 or will it be in 

a separate box?



73, Igor UA9CDC 







      

______________________________________________________________

Elecraft mailing list

Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm

Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net



This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net

Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html