[Elecraft] FT-5000 againts K3 ?
Bill W4ZV
btippett at alum.mit.edu
Sat May 22 16:14:38 EDT 2010
Joe Subich, W4TV-4 wrote:
>
>
> I don't believe that the K3 is ranked number 1 only based on
> footnotes. Consider the 100 KHz blocking numbers, the better
> wide spaced dynamic range, much lower MDS (without a preamp),
> or better phase noise performance (vs. the Flex-5000) and the
> K3 is overall a much better, more well balanced performer.
>
Joe you're mistaken about the ranking methodology. At the very top of the
page, it states:
*********************************
Receiver Test Data
(Sorted by Dynamic Range Narrow Spaced)
*********************************
http://www.sherweng.com/table.html
I agree that other parameters are important, but Rob's ranking is actually
by 2 kHz IMDDR3 *only*. Hence my quibble with ranking the K3 #1, which is
not true if based on apples-to-apples (500 Hz BW) measurements.
73, Bill
--
View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/FT-5000-againts-K3-tp5088345p5089108.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list