[Elecraft] FT5000 review in Radcom

[Hector Padron]

Yes you are absolutely right,all companies should use the same circuit design or even improve it further more but its hard to believe that a company that has been sleeping  in the darkness in regards to receiver performance sudenly has woke up,like I said,I don't know who is that Radcom or what,I will trust only when I see the performance checked by Sherwood labs and if it is the truth well then we have to congratulate Yaesu.
 
AD4C
 


"For a refined ham it is compulsory to own a k3"

--- On Sat, 5/22/10, Bob Cunnings <bob.cunnings at gmail.com> wrote:


From: Bob Cunnings <bob.cunnings at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] FT5000 review in Radcom
To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net
Date: Saturday, May 22, 2010, 3:14 PM


On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Hector Padron <ad4c2008 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Third in place ??? I will not believe it until I see the performance reports from Sherwood labs.
>
> AD4C
>

Why not? I wouldn't be surprised to see incremental improvement in
this area, now that it is finally receiving the attention it deserves.
Contesters should be happy that more manufacturers are heeding the
call to produce properly designed down conversion receivers in the
mold of Orion, and K3. Choice is good.

Bob NW8L
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html