[Elecraft] K3 - SPE Expert 1K-FA and ALC
Tom W8JI
w8ji at w8ji.com
Sun May 16 06:00:38 EDT 2010
David,
Bandwidth might not be a good argument. I'm not convinced
ALC transients are a major universal problem with SSB
signals when they are compared to other reasons for
bandwidth problems. This isn't the appropriate forum for
that discussion.
I have looked at ALC overshoot because of my connection with
amplifier designs and failures in semiconductors and other
sensitive components caused by ALC problems, and the pulse
duration is very short. That short pulse repeats only after
the ALC has discharged significantly, so the transmitter's
gain is high.
The problem is a great deal like automatic bias, where the
leading edge always causes some distortion as the circuitry
changes states. The deeper the bias, the more time it takes
to remove it and the stronger the unwanted off-channel
energy. ALC is a little worse because the control signal is
sampled after some delay and has to wrap back around to the
start. This means no matter what they do in the amplifier
the cannot cure the leading edge problem. The one exception
would be if they held the ALC voltage high and then pulled
it down to a level that allowed proper drive. They may be
doing that, but an indicator would be a slow power rise on
the leading edges. It is a mirror of normal ALC.
As for bandwidth measurements, I'm not convinced the
WaveNode is good at transient analysis. With FFT analysis,
the window where waveform is sampled has to be present at
the same time as the transient, and the processing cannot
average the power. It has to calculate to provide bandwidth
information of the very short duration peaks. The problem is
much like the reason a conventional spectrum analyzer will
miss ALC problems in all but a few really severe cases. If
it isn't sampling the transient frequency when it is there,
the extra bandwidth doesn't show.
I'm not convinced at all, because the overshoot is so short,
it is the major problem we hear on the air....or even a
significant one. I'm not convinced, and actually think it
unlikely, the WaveNode could measure such a short burst.
All that aside, because it is a big discussion, we are left
with the fact Elecraft has clearly warned to NOT do 100%
power control with an external ALC source. That warning is
100% understandable based on the unique way the K3 ALC
works. It is absolute common sense the K3 ALC should not be
replaced with a traditional external ALC for primary power
level control. Even without Wayne's warning, I would not do
it now that I understand how the K3 ALC works.
To prevent splatter, the K3's internal pre-filter ALC must
have primary control of power limits. The amplifier should
only provide a fail-safe control that pulls back or kills
the exciter drive if limits are reached.
By the way, I'm testing new PA module designs with an IC706.
It has terrible ALC overshoot. It has "100-watt plus"
transients when I have it set at 20 watts to drive the PA
modules. The K3 does not. Fortunately the MRF-150's are able
to handle the 600% overdrive bursts from the IC706 without
failure. I keep a couple ICOM's around just for that reason.
I cannot test for PA module survival with a bad ALC system
in the exciter using the K3, unless I ran the K3 power on
full and used an external ALC detector system. Then I could
make the K3 emulate the IC-706. Why would people not testing
things want to do that????
73 Tom
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list