[Elecraft] Grounding negative side of power supply?
Tom W8JI
w8ji at w8ji.com
Tue Apr 20 06:31:04 EDT 2010
<Refer to the NEC. It's their rule.
As a side note, a loss of property covered by insurance may
be dissallowed
if they find improper grounding contributed to the damage.
And they
reference the NEC with regard to "proper".>
I'm not so sure we aren't getting carried away with our own
interpretation of NEC rules here. We also have to apply a
little technical "common sense" to our systems.
I have antennas and towers scatter over thousands of feet
distance. It would be totally worthless and physically
impossible to bond the ground rods on my antennas to my
mains ground. The additional protection to my house and
equipment, and to people, would be zero.
In addition to no improvement in protection, the
effectiveness of the low-noise antennas would be greatly
decreased.
Then we have to consider odds that power lines, trees, and
our large towers would be ignored by lightning and a small
ten-foot-tall twenty-foot-long, antenna would be struck. If
it were struck, where would the majority charges move? In
the feeder to the house. If the feeder ground were bonded to
the mains ground at the building entrance, the safety issue
for people and the dwelling is closed at that point. The
ground at the dwelling entrance, that is mandated by NEC to
be bonded to the mains ground, is key to safety. Not the
critical signal ground at some backyard clothesline antenna.
I also frequently hear that "insurance disallowed"
statement. If insurance was "disallowed" for a NEC safety or
rule violation, very few claims would ever be paid. In my
entire life I can't recall having a claim denied because of
something like this. I would bet well over half of Ham
stations lack a proper entrance or station ground bonded to
the mains ground, but I don't recall ever knowing of a claim
disallowed for that gross error.
73 Tom
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list