[Elecraft] 2.7 vs 2.8 vs 1.8 & 2.1

[Brett Howard]

Before you plunge have you seen that there are 1.5's available? 

~Brett 

On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 14:56 -0500, Bill K9YEQ wrote:
> Skip my question.... should have read the archives first.  I have my
> answer... 1.8 for me.
> 
> Bill
> K9YEQ
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bill K9YEQ
> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 2:47 PM
> To: 'David Ferrington, M0XDF'; 'Bob Garceau'
> Cc: elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 2.7 vs 2.8 vs 1.8 & 2.1
> 
> I am using a pair of 8 pole 2.8 and am very happy.  There is at times tons
> of qrm on 75 meters in the evening.  Question:  Is anyone using the 2.8 and
> 2.1/1.8 filters and what is the on-the-air experience?
> 
> Bill
> K9YEQ
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of David Ferrington,
> M0XDF
> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 7:06 AM
> To: Bob Garceau
> Cc: elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 2.7 vs 2.8
> 
> Since you seem to favour 8 pole, I'd say do it. You should be able to get a
> rebate on the 2.8kHz against the 2.7kHz.
> Also, if you are going to get the KRX3, it's simple to align the 8 pole
> filters - otherwise you need to tell Elecraft what the offset of your 2.7kHz
> is