[Elecraft] 2.7 vs 2.8
Tom W8JI
w8ji at w8ji.com
Mon Apr 12 10:09:36 EDT 2010
<<Why? If there's a single offending station, using the
shift control with a
2.8Khz-8pole filter will be just as effective as with a
1.8Khz-8pole filter
in minimizing the interference since the slopes are
similarly steep.>>
I'm not a big fan of excessive shifting of passbands to
clean up QRM. The problem is the change in passband would
add other problems like noise that is lower pitched or,
depending on the IF and selectivy system, even a little
opposite sideband response. A narrower filter is always the
better option performance-wise.
The only debate is in cost vs. benefit. With passband tuning
(IF shift) and narrow and wider filters, I find myself
almost always using the narrower filter. Part of the reason
is if the band is clear away from the offending station, it
is easier to get everyone to turn the VFO dial. When there
is no room to move a little, then it is very obvious there
is QRM both above and below. For me it is a no-brainer. I
always buy an assortment of filters for each mode that
includes normal and "extra narrow".
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list