[Elecraft] 2.7 vs 2.8
Jim Miller KG0KP
JimMiller at STL-OnLine.Net
Mon Apr 12 09:27:44 EDT 2010
IMHO - NO. The 2.7 or 2.8 is used as your "normal" phone filter. The
difference is the slope of the skirts being steeper on the 8 pole, BUT, when
you NEED to rid yourself of close a close in strong station, you will be far
better off to have added a 2.1 or 1.8 filter rather than trying to "get by"
with the 2.7 OR the 2.8 filters.
I see I am bucking the vote here but for nearly the same money spent on
adding my 1.8, I see FAR better performance than having used it on 2.8
"upgrade" from the 2.7.
73, de Jim KG0KP
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Garceau" <rgarceau at snet.net>
To: <elecraft at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 6:52 AM
Subject: [Elecraft] 2.7 vs 2.8
> I'm getting a K3.
>
>
>
> Is is worth taking the hit and replacing the 2.7 khz 5 pole with the 2.8
> khz
> 8 pole?
>
> Just to let you know, all the rest of the filters that I plan to buy will
> be
> 8 pole.
>
>
>
> Bob, W1EQ
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list