[Elecraft] Winkeyer -> K2 ... weighting equality

[John Huffman]

Mike -

I'm using the standalone model.  Is paddle setpoint the same as 'Sample' 
in the WK2Mgr program?

73 de K1ESE
John

Mike Harris wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Interesting this.
> 
> I struggled for ages with trying to use mHAM CW Keyer (iambic B) until I 
> dropped the paddle setpoint setting to 35.  After that it is almost the 
> same as the K2 keyer.  Now when using the PC for contest logging I can 
> drop to the paddles without making a total hash of what I'm trying to 
> send.  I only use the mHAM a couple of times a year.
> 
> It will be interesting to see how the K2 and K3 internal keyers compare. 
> The two CW instrument ports on the K3 could be the solution.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Mike VP8NO
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Steve Jackson" <kz1x at yahoo.com>
> To: <elecraft at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 4:27 PM
> Subject: [Elecraft] Winkeyer -> K2 ... weighting equality
> 
> 
> | The internal keyer in my K2 seems to have a different 'weighting' (or 
> something) compared to my new K1EL Winkeyer.
> |
> | I have been playing with the settings on the latter to try and make 
> these two devices 'sound' the same.
> |
> | Frankly, after 8+ years, I've grown to like the K2's rhythm in this 
> sense, but don't really care much for the UI of the built-in keyer when 
> operating 'fixed.'  And, I needed PC control from several applications, 
> anyway.  So I'm converting to the external gizmo.
> |
> | So far, the subtleties of the set-up have eluded me.  Anyone else do 
> this yet, successfully?  Or am I just being very, um, picky?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
>  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft    
> 
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>