[Elecraft] Winkeyer -> K2 ... weighting equality
Mike Harris
mike.harris at horizon.co.fk
Sat Jan 5 15:55:38 EST 2008
Hi,
Interesting this.
I struggled for ages with trying to use mHAM CW Keyer (iambic B) until I
dropped the paddle setpoint setting to 35. After that it is almost the
same as the K2 keyer. Now when using the PC for contest logging I can
drop to the paddles without making a total hash of what I'm trying to
send. I only use the mHAM a couple of times a year.
It will be interesting to see how the K2 and K3 internal keyers compare.
The two CW instrument ports on the K3 could be the solution.
Regards,
Mike VP8NO
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Jackson" <kz1x at yahoo.com>
To: <elecraft at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 4:27 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] Winkeyer -> K2 ... weighting equality
| The internal keyer in my K2 seems to have a different 'weighting' (or
something) compared to my new K1EL Winkeyer.
|
| I have been playing with the settings on the latter to try and make
these two devices 'sound' the same.
|
| Frankly, after 8+ years, I've grown to like the K2's rhythm in this
sense, but don't really care much for the UI of the built-in keyer when
operating 'fixed.' And, I needed PC control from several applications,
anyway. So I'm converting to the external gizmo.
|
| So far, the subtleties of the set-up have eluded me. Anyone else do
this yet, successfully? Or am I just being very, um, picky?
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list