[Elecraft] Morse test elimination

[Matthew D. Pitts]

I'd rather say it's the "fault" of the ITU, if you want the truth. They were 
the ones to let the code go back in 2003.

Matthew N8OHU
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Fred (FL)" <ncsailors at yahoo.com>
To: <elecraft at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 9:46 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] Morse test elimination


I think it is a sorry state, where FCC feels Morse
Code isn't needed any longer.  Frankly I don't think
the FCC is all that technical an agency any longer.
Many of their frequently-changing commissioners - seem
to be non-technical "kids", or political appointees.
I'm sure the US Government budget treats them poorly,
compared  to the "homeland security" and DOD agencies.


I'm sure they have their complement of career staffers
- many of whom may be technical.  But the
commissioners
seem to frequently disagree with the ARRL, and they
do things in opposite directions of what common
technical sense would indicate.  They don't even
agree with the IEEE - the electrical engineering
society, on some technical issues.  Digital over
power lines is one example!

I think the Blackberry digital phone message
contest of a Blackberry handheld vs 2 Morse
operators - sort of told it all.  Morse Code
won, handily!  Keyboarding cell phones lost.
(Re: Jany Leno Tonight Show - 2006)

Looks like the World Amateur Ham community will
be the ones keeping CW alive - in the near
term.  Or spy agencies worldwide.

Fred
FL

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com