[Elecraft] ELEPRODUCT POLL (WAS Any advice on the OHR
WM-2 QRPwattmeter?)
Kevin Rock
kevinrock at earthlink.net
Fri May 14 20:05:13 EDT 2004
Great idea! I miss the S-100 bus very much. I thought it was a very
useful addition to microcomputers. It allowed me to experiment by
creating my own peripheral boards in the hey day of computers. Plug and
pray is not the way I grew up.
Only trouble is the communication protocol is a closed book on the K2.
And the firmware is also a closed book. Kind of like the Apple computer
and the Microsoft OS. Aghhh! I put those two in the same sentence!
73,
Kevin.
On Fri, 14 May 2004 16:19:32 -0700, Vic Rosenthal <vic at rakefet.com> wrote:
> Roger Marrotte wrote:
>
>> How about a slightly larger K2 case with a larger front panel that has
>> more
>> controls for things like DSP ON/OFF, a larger display showing the second
>> VFO, etc. Just drop in the old insides and plug in a new set of
>> firmware.
>> I'd also like to have a TX monitor.
>
> This is a good idea. There would be room for a larger speaker, power
> supply, etc. Does anyone remember the S-100 bus computers? How about a
> completely modular unit with slots for such things as the 100 watt PA
> and tuner, KRC2 board, digital modes adaptor (including digital voice
> encoding/decoding), panadaptor (what would be called today a band-scan
> display), etc. Build your K2 to fit your operating needs.
>
> In fact the bus specification could be open. Then other manufacturers
> could produce K2-compatible boards. A communications protocol could
> pass messages to the main firmware, allowing configuration of adapter
> boards from a main menu. Would this hurt Elecraft? It didn't hurt the
> IBM PC!
>
--
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list