[Elecraft] EC2 and KPA100 question

[email protected] [email protected]
Sun Mar 9 11:48:00 2003


Eddy -
I recently sold my K2/100 to a fellow list member and am currently building
another K2 - this time with the amp and KAT100 in the EC2 enclosure.  As you
may guess I enjoy building, but I found that I was missing the flexibility
of being able to take just one box (ie the K2, battery and ATU) and throw it
in a suitcase etc. Also there is some merit to keeping more heat away from
the K2 as you say. Just my 2 cents.
73/Tim NZ7C
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eddy Avila" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 7:13 AM
Subject: [Elecraft] EC2 and KPA100 question


> As I wait patiently for my new K2 kit to come from Elecraft and
comtemplate
> the future purchase of the KPA100 I wonder how many have chosen to install
> the 100-watt amp into the EC2 enclosure instead of the K2? It sure seems
> like the way to go since it would keep the K2 as a true QRp/portable
> battery-operated hf rig and still go QRO when needed! Also, I've read it
> solves any frequency-drift problems due to heat as well....
>
> So, curious how many have chosen the EC2 route and was the a good choice
> after all compared to installing the KPA100 in the K2?
>
> tnx...73 /k6sdw
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list: [email protected]
> You must be a list member to post to the list.
> Postings must be plain text (no HTML or attachments).
> See: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Elecraft Web Page: http://www.elecraft.com