[Elecraft] K2 Remote via the Internet

Sun Mar 2 18:15:00 2003

Dan wrote:
 >Terminal Services is WAY faster than NetOp, and NetOp is WAY faster than
> PCAnywhere, and RemotelyPossible still blows up everytime I look at it.
I've
> never run into VNC, but I'll take your word for it that it's efficient.

Oh no Dan, it is not as "efficient" as many others - it is just free!!!!!

Regards,

Tony

All mail in and out checked lovingly by hand, character by character.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Barker" <[email protected]>
To: "Elecraft" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 8:02 PM
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] K2 Remote via the Internet

> Just talking theory here, not practice. The "Client Side Work" should be
> done by the "Client". For my IE chart, it was a 6 to 1 difference over the
> wire.
>
> Terminal Services is WAY faster than NetOp, and NetOp is WAY faster than
> PCAnywhere, and RemotelyPossible still blows up everytime I look at it.
I've
> never run into VNC, but I'll take your word for it that it's efficient.
>
> Efficient is my middle name (just see:
> http://www.visioncomm.com/Patents/5420965.html).
>
> Dan / WG4S / K2 #2456.
>
> <snip Tony Sez>
> Dan, VNC and other good products allow reduced graphic rendering on the
> clientside, reducing bandwitdh. .For some corporates, VNC is used for
remote
> PC support for homeworkers.
> </snip>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list: [email protected]
> You must be a list member to post to the list.
> Postings must be plain text (no HTML or attachments).
> See: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Elecraft Web Page: http://www.elecraft.com
>