[Elecraft] K2 Frequency Alignment
Masleid, Michael A.
[email protected]
Mon Jul 28 16:59:00 2003
Hello Don,
I think this is a bit more complicated.
>You have hit the nail on the head.
>Attaching anything to the 4 MHz oscillator circuit will pull its
>frequency!!!
>My rule of thumb - never attempt ot measure the frequency of an =
oscillator
>by connecting to the oscillator section - measure after a stage of
>buffering, or use indirect pickup methods.
There is an exception. When you measure the frequency of the reference
oscillator of a counter with the counter itself, it should show the same
value, regardless of what frequency it is actually running at. A one =
foot
ruler is exactly one foot long, if you use that same ruler to measure =
itself.
>Sooooo - when one attaches a probe, adjusts it to exactly 4000.00 kHz, =
then
>removes the probe, the oscillating frequency is NOT 4000.00 kHz =
anymore.
Understood. To compare the 4 MHz oscillator to other signals, I hang a =
wire
clip near the top of the crystal. To make sure I'm not messing up the
oscillator, I watch the signal get lost in the noise as I pull the clip
away from the control board.
>Bottom line - don't do it that way!!! Apologies to the experienced =
folks
>who already know that, but I fear there are several looking and =
listening
>who are not aware of the consequences.
This method is per step 3, page 45 of the Owners Manual, revision E. =
Not
useful for setting C22, but certainly a good way to test the counter. =
In
my case, in step 3, I get 3999.98 kHz. It doesn't change when C22 is
adjusted.
>Since CAL FCTR is only accurate if the 4000.00 kHz oscillator is =
correct,
Are you very sure of that? For some reason, on #3430, CAL FCTR gives =
results
that are 5 parts per million low when the oscillator is set to 4 MHz. =
Is
it possible that the correct value for the 4000.00 kHz oscillator is =
about
4000.02 kHz in my case?
>using CAL FCTR to measure a known external frequency (such as a stable
>oscillator) and adjusting C22 until the display shows the correct =
frequency
>of that external oscillator is an excellent method.
>Just be certain that you do know the frequency of that external =
oscillator.
>The finished product is only as good as the tools used to produce it.
I agree fully. Another method involves measuring an unknown oscillator =
that
is at least stable. Calibrate the K2, and check error against WWV and =
other
known standards. Use the error to extimate exactly what the unknown =
must have
been, and adjust C22 to display that frequency for the unknown =
oscillator.
Calibrate the K2, and check error against WWV again, repeat as needed.
73, Michael, AB9GV