[DX] eQSL cards - NOW ACCEPTED - for DXCC
Charles Johnston
[email protected]
Fri, 8 Feb 2002 17:23:15 -0700
Here ya go Ron....(and others)
This was posted this morning (on the eQSL Discussion email list) and
includes Bill Moore's own words from an email by Bill and his clear
thoughts on this entire issue.
This is the entire message unedited and un-snipped except the headers
are not included. I can post them too if need be...
Here it is...
--------------------------
Score 1 for the Gipper. Professionally printed and mailed eQSL's
now have ARRL's official stamp of approval. Please read the
following note from Bill Moore, NC1L, DXCC Manager to me. I would
have clipped it for brevity, the last paragraph is what counts but
Bill asks that the message only be used in it's entirety.
Happy eQSLing
----
73, Rich - W3ZJ
Hi Rich:
Something does not sound right here. You are saying that Dave is
physically
mailing out QSL cards by the US postal system? This is news to me.
If you are my QSL manager and I send you my logs by e-mail, I am
sending
them direct from point A to point B. Just as if I was sending them
to you by
regular mail. This is OK. I remember somewhere several years ago
that some
people used to get their logs over the air on RTTY and another
digital mode
(AMTOR I think). Not a problem.
However, if as the result of a log being sent to E-QSL, someone
goes in and
receives a card electronically and uses it for DXCC, that e-QSL
cannot be
accepted for DXCC credit under rule 2. I spent a bit of time with
a simple
shareware program to prove the unreliability of that method.
However, if Dave, acting as QSL manager with station logs
completes a card
(even one from his printer) and sends it by mail to you, this is
an
acceptable exchange and we have see this often for several years
now.
(assuming he phyiscally checks the log). Many people use self-made
cards
from their printer. Each one is evaluated on a case by case basis,
and many
times under Section IV rule 4(b) we have conducted an audit to
insure the
vaildity of a card like this.
In cases like this it would be REAL nice if they used a stamp or
placed
their initials or signature on it, but this is not required by the
rules.
However, this issue has been discussed and has been given some
consideration.
To clarify, if Dave is sending out cards through the US Postal
System as the
result of the log(s) he receives, this is OK. (This would
basically be
operating as QSL manager).
Regards,
Bill Moore NC1L
DXCC Manager
Note: Use of this message is authorized in discussions as long as
it is used
in its entirity and as long as parts are not edited out.
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get your FREE credit report with a FREE CreditCheck
Monitoring Service trial
http://us.click.yahoo.com/ACHqaB/bQ8CAA/ySSFAA/ELTolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
(No subject or text body entries are required.)
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
73 / DX
Charles T Johnston
Prescott, Arizona - U.S.A.
[email protected]
AB7SL - Ham Radio Pages
Official W9INN Antennas Page
www.ab7sl.com