[Dx-qsl] Claiming 160m DXCC - Sending QSLs
Richard F DiDonna NN3W
nn3w at cox.net
Mon May 25 16:05:53 EDT 2009
Agreed. I think that postal services in many industrialized countries are
fine, but even then, I'm more willing to hand carry the cards to a
convention for in-person checking. Even if you insured the cards and the
postal service lost them, how could you possibly attach a value to them that
the postal authority will accept?
73 Rich NN3W
----- Original Message -----
From: "G4GED Dave" <radiodave.g4ged at tiscali.co.uk>
To: <topband at contesting.com>; <dx-qsl at mailman.qth.net>; <g4puq at aol.com>
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 2:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Dx-qsl] Claiming 160m DXCC - Sending QSLs
>
> ----- Original Message ----- >
>
>> As far as I am aware 160m cards are not eligible for field checking and
>> must be submitted to ARRL HQ. I feel a bit uneasy about parting with my
>> valued cards, what is the best (SAFEST) way of sending my cards to and
>> from Newington.
>
>> 73 Peter G4PUQ
>>
> My best advice Peter, would be to take them along with the DXCC Form to
> the
> RSGB HF Convention in October, where providing there is an ARRL rep.
> present, as there normally is, your cards can be checked.
> You can confirm this by emailing the present field checker John, G3LZQ.
> 73 Dave G4GED
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> DX-QSL mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx-qsl
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:DX-QSL at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the DX-QSL
mailing list