[Dx-qsl] Support for K3ZO

[Dave Haney]

Gentlemen,
Let's all take a deep breath and take a step back.

We all do things differently, and we all need to respect that. We also all 
need to show respect for each other and a tolerance for differences in 
methodology. So please---no more criticism because someone does something in 
a different manner than what you think is most effective (or most whatever).

Enough said.

73 es gud DX
Dave Haney
W3SJ
List Administrator


> To all you flamers:
>
> If this was meant to be a shot at me for my posting, it only serves to
> show me you (and others) are not capable of reading what has been said:
> I will make this as simple as I possibly can.
>
> 1. Not once, on any posting, have I seen anyone say the efforts of K3ZO
> were not appreciated or not necessary.
> 2. Personally, I'm delighted that he is willing to make such an effort
> to keep us informed.  It's a job that is very much unappreciated and
> unfortunately. remains thankless .
>
> What you flamers are unable to recognize is that it is only the _manner_
> in which the information is provided that can be annoying to some, and
> nothing more than that.  In my posting and in ever posting I have read
> on this subject by others, that and only that, is what is being said.
> In a nutshell, the problem that is causing some annoyance, is that there
> is a separate posting  for each  callsign that is causing a problem in
> QSLing.  So if there were 10 such problems encountered and Fred was
> letting us know, then there would be 10 separate postings. That was his
> way of accomplishing his goal and sending us information.  Remember, you
> can't please everyone.  There are a lot of hams who do not care nor
> desire such information.  They have the right to choose, same as you do.
>
> What I posted in an effort to settle everyone down and still have Fred
> send the information to us without causing someone to become annoyed,
> was to save up all the notifications for the day or the week (whatever
> would be best), then put them all on _one posting_ and send it to the
> reflector.  That way, you get all the notices and they are gathered all
> together for you, and for the others, there is only the one posting
> every day (again, whatever frequency is best) so there will not be a
> high number of separate postings each day.
>
> I can't make it any simpler than that.  I think it's a win-win situation
> all around.  You get all the notices, the others only see one notice per
> day and Fred's work is cut down a bit because only one posting is
> required that will contain all the information.
>
> Now, tell me where I'm wrong.  Why won't this work??
>
> Fred, if you are reading this, would you please offer me your opinion?
>
> Regards,
> Tru (VE6TP)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> gm4fam at tiscali.co.uk wrote:
>> Well said Fred K3ZO and Nenad VE3EXY - such a shame that a very few,
>> (emphasise FEW), don't appreciate your great efforts.
>>
>> In my book, your postings are just as useful as postings expressing
>> good experiences with QSL managers; this hobby is all about effective
>> communication, so let's keep it civil and not broadcast the negatives
>> about a guy's positive efforts on OUR behalf, cos these outbursts help
>> no-one and will discourage the very subscribers who Fred, Nenad and all
>> are trying to reach.
>>
>> Keep em coming fellas!
>> 73 Cris
>> GM4FAM
> ______________________________________________________________
> DX-QSL mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx-qsl
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:DX-QSL at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>