[Dx-qsl] Most LIDS will at least change frequency, but not WF5W

[Michael G. Carper]

Public Apology....

Cal and I exchanged emails and I'm now quite sure it wasn't Cal who was
tuning up this morning.  I apologized to Cal and I wanted to reiterate the
apology here in this forum - I'm sorry, Cal.  And yes, I was too quick to
jump on that one and shouldn't have used the reflector to flame anyone -
particularly the innocent.

73 es DX for all,

Mike, WA9PIE

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Haney [mailto:w3sj at tampabay.rr.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:41 AM
To: Michael G. Carper; dx-qsl at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Dx-qsl] Most LIDS will at least change frequency, but not WF5W

Let's not confuse suspicion with proof.

Let's also remember that the purpose of this list is NOT to flame other 
hams.

If you have (or THINK you have) an issue with another ham, contact him (or 
her) DIRECTLY to try to resolve the issue.

73
Dave Haney
W3SJ
List Administrator


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael G. Carper" <mike at wa9pie.net>
To: <dx-qsl at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 7:22 AM
Subject: [Dx-qsl] Most LIDS will at least change frequency, but not WF5W


> Today he tuned right over the top of (a very weak) FO/N6JA at 12:14 UTC on
> 3.501 MHz and then proceeded to call him.  It sounds like WF5W got
> everything tuned up pretty well, because he was LOUD.
>
>
>
> Why did the term "dummy load" get coined?
>
>
>
> Ugh.
>
>
>
> Mike, WA9PIE
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> DX-QSL mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx-qsl
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:DX-QSL at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>