[FWD: RE: [Dx-qsl] QSL's valid ?]]

[w4sco at sco-inc.org]

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [FWD: RE: [Dx-qsl] QSL's valid ?]
> From: sco at sco-inc.com
> Date: Thu, December 06, 2007 12:01 am
> To: w4sco at sco-inc.org
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [Dx-qsl] QSL's valid ?
> From: sco at sco-inc.com
> Date: Wed, December 05, 2007 10:42 pm
> To: Al Bailey <k8six at comcast.net>
> Cc: dx-qsl at mailman.qth.net
> 
> What is not being said is that there is NO way to tell if a card was
> printed and delivered thru the mail or via MyQSL. So how can it be
> rejected?
> 
> And there are other awards besides the ones from the ARRL. CQ Awards is
> reviewing the idea and may approve MyQSL as a delivery protocal.
> 
> The awards that accept eQSL should accept MyQSL.
> 
> Les W4SCO
> 
>  -------- Original Message --------
>  Subject: [Dx-qsl] QSL's valid ?
>  From: Al Bailey <k8six at comcast.net>
>  Date: Wed, December 05, 2007 10:08 pm
>  To: dx-qsl at mailman.qth.net
>  
>  About a week ago some folks were wondering if cards going through 
>  http://www.scoincsoftware.com/
>  were acceptable for ARRL awards. I asked Bill Moore at the DXCC desk 
>  and the answer is absolutely not.
>  
>  Sorta like eQSL, eh !!!
>  
>  
>  &quot;Don't it always seem to go that you don't know what you've
> got...till it's gone.&quot; from Big Yellow Taxi (Joni Mitchell) but
> also true about QSL.NET if more users don't open their wallets and help
> financially. Please contribute TODAY !!