[Dx-qsl] IARU Administrative Council re QSL Bureaus
Nenad Stevanovic
nenad at nortel.com
Tue Aug 15 21:41:23 EDT 2006
Fred,
This is well known fact. I categorize the bureaus as follows:
1. Still functionig QSL bureaus
2. Rx only
3. Disfunctional (no funds for the PO BOX, or no distribution)
4. Closed.
Even the category one is reducing the level of service, trying to
contain costs. The frequency of sending is being reduced in favour
of larger, less frequent packets.
73 Nenad VE3EXY
-----Original Message-----
From: Alfred Laun
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 7:29 PM
To: DX- QSL
Subject: [Dx-qsl] IARU Administrative Council re QSL Bureaus
A press release by the IARU Administrative Council, which has just
concluded a meeting in India, includes the following statement:
"In additional actions, the Administrative Council... discussed
problems facing QSL bureaus operated by IARU member-societies,
recognizing that the cost of forwarding of QSL cards is substantial for
some member-societies."
73, Fred Laun, K3ZO
More information about the DX-QSL
mailing list