[Dx-qsl] S05X

Sat Apr 19 17:07:01 2003

Hi Stu,

That could be the answer. I never did submit that S05R card, so I don't know
if it was acceptable to the ARRL or not. I am now working them on every
band, so it is becoming a moot point. Thanks for your help in explaining
this conundrum.

73,   Carl   VE9OV
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stuart Santelmann KC1F" <[email protected]>
To: "Carl Smidt" <[email protected]>; "Dx-qsl" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2003 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Dx-qsl] S05X

> Hi Carl :
>
>     By golly, you're right !  I also worked SO5R in April of 2000, but
sent
> the card via the bureau and haven't heard back yet.  I also have a QSL
from
> S02R (not "SO2R" in Poland).  The S05X guys are doing a bangup job, but it
> does seem that the claim of an all-time new prefix is flawed...
>
>
>                                                                 73
> Stu        KC1F
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Carl Smidt" <[email protected]>
> To: "Stuart Santelmann KC1F" <[email protected]>; "Dx-qsl"
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2003 5:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [Dx-qsl] S05X
>
>
> > Yes Stu, I have the S05R QSL card.
> >
> > Operators were Naama, S01A and Arseli, EA2JG. My contact was on April
23,
> > 2000. QSL was via EA2JG.
> >
> > 73,   Carl   VE9OV
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Stuart Santelmann KC1F" <[email protected]>
> > To: "Carl Smidt" <[email protected]>; "Dx-qsl" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2003 11:59 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Dx-qsl] S05X
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > I have worked S05X on several bands now, nice signals and good
> > operators,
> > > > but am wondering why it is said that this is a special, first time
> ever,
> > > > call or prefix?
> > > >
> > > > I have, in the past, worked S05R  --  S07L  --  S07NY  --  S07U and
> > > S0RASD.
> > > >
> > > > What am I missing regarding the special nature of this new
operation?
> > > >
> > > > 73,   Carl    VE9OV
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Carl:
> > >
> > > I think the prefix for WPX purposes is "S05" and not simply "S0" - do
> you
> > > have a QSL from S05R ?  That would invalidate their claim of an
all-time
> > new
> > > prefix !
> > >
> > >                                 Very 73 from NH
Stu
> > > KC1F
> > >
> > > Now, more than ever, QSL.NET is in urgent need of your financial
> support.
> > > Please help QSL.NET by sending a donation now.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Now, more than ever, QSL.NET is in urgent need of your financial support.
> Please help QSL.NET by sending a donation now.
>