[Dx-qsl] S05X

Sat Apr 19 12:54:00 2003

Hi Carl :

    By golly, you're right !  I also worked SO5R in April of 2000, but sent
the card via the bureau and haven't heard back yet.  I also have a QSL from
S02R (not "SO2R" in Poland).  The S05X guys are doing a bangup job, but it
does seem that the claim of an all-time new prefix is flawed...


                                                                73
Stu        KC1F


----- Original Message -----
From: "Carl Smidt" <[email protected]>
To: "Stuart Santelmann KC1F" <[email protected]>; "Dx-qsl"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2003 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Dx-qsl] S05X


> Yes Stu, I have the S05R QSL card.
>
> Operators were Naama, S01A and Arseli, EA2JG. My contact was on April 23,
> 2000. QSL was via EA2JG.
>
> 73,   Carl   VE9OV
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stuart Santelmann KC1F" <[email protected]>
> To: "Carl Smidt" <[email protected]>; "Dx-qsl" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2003 11:59 AM
> Subject: Re: [Dx-qsl] S05X
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > > I have worked S05X on several bands now, nice signals and good
> operators,
> > > but am wondering why it is said that this is a special, first time
ever,
> > > call or prefix?
> > >
> > > I have, in the past, worked S05R  --  S07L  --  S07NY  --  S07U and
> > S0RASD.
> > >
> > > What am I missing regarding the special nature of this new operation?
> > >
> > > 73,   Carl    VE9OV
> > >
> >
> >
> > Hi Carl:
> >
> > I think the prefix for WPX purposes is "S05" and not simply "S0" - do
you
> > have a QSL from S05R ?  That would invalidate their claim of an all-time
> new
> > prefix !
> >
> >                                 Very 73 from NH                      Stu
> > KC1F
> >
> > Now, more than ever, QSL.NET is in urgent need of your financial
support.
> > Please help QSL.NET by sending a donation now.
> >
>
>
>
>