[Dx-qsl] Multiple QSOs

[FireBrick]

Hal
printing out qsl's by hand is a BAD BAD BAD idea.
I'm a manager and I'm sure all the other managers will agree.
We waste a lot of time trying to decipher handwriting, printing, and format.
Computer printed labels are SO much easier to read.

I've even gotten cards where I had a hell of a time figuring out what the
callsign was much less the qso data...

----- Original Message -----
From: <k4hb@earthlink.net>
To: <dx-qsl@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Dx-qsl] Multiple QSOs


> >
>
> Thanks for the many replies I have received in such a short period of
time.
> Labels are a good solution, but I like to do things the old fashioned way
> and fill out my cards by hand. Two people have suggested an idea that I
> like. That is, when putting QSOs on the back of the card, put all of them
> there. That sounds like a great idea. Put all of them on the front, or all
> of them on the back. It's easy to understand how QSOs can be missed when a
> manager is trying to answer many thousands and they are on both sides of
the
> card.
>
>
> --
> 73,
> Hal K4HB
> http://www.k4hb.com
>
>      (\____/)
>      / � _ � \
>     (   (oo)  )
>      \-..~~.-/
>       DX Pig
>     Oink Oink
>
>
> Please help QSL.NET . Send your donation now.
>
>