[Drake] R4C

Sat, 20 Mar 2004 18:03:20 -0500

If nothing else has been decided here it is great to see the chatter about Drakes. I enjoy the opinions and ideas. I have the 1A,
2B/BQ, 2C/CQ, 4B, 4C(with Sherwood mods), TR-7A, I listen to them all regularly. The 2B is actually my favorite but the best part
about the Drakes is their ease of use and the performance is in the ears of the beholder.

Once again it is great to read the comments on a relatively quiet list these past months. Keep it up!
Bill Marx W2CQ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Drake] R4C

> One of the previous posters remarked that their R4C was better than Icom's
> latest offerings. I fell that I must disagree. I have a IC-761, a IC-745, and a
> 756PRO (bought in Tokyo) that will out perform my MINT, STOCK, R4C any day.
> Not to mention the much better ergonomics. Yep, Drakes are great (and I have a
> LOT), but that was then, this is now......
> I still prefer the R4B to the R4C, I guess that's why I have 2 R4Bs.......
>
>
> ron
>
> N4UE
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
> or had an attachment.  Attachments are not allowed.  To learn how
> to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html  ---
> _______________________________________________
> Drake mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/drake