[CW] Updated Radio Frequency Exposure Rules Become Effective May 3
W4BIN
ka4inm at gmail.com
Tue Apr 13 18:56:49 EDT 2021
On 4/13/21 6:03 PM, Steve WD8DAS via CW wrote:
> That's one of the most important questions, Doc, and the ARRL
> announcement did a weak job of covering that point.
> As far as I can tell no filing would be needed, just an analysis of your
> station(s) covering every antenna and every band at highest possible
> power levels for each.
> Another question: Did anyone actually do a study of amateur stations to
> see if the exemption was a mistake and this change is really needed? I
> doubt it, or if someone did I bet it is full of assumptions. I'd expect
> that 99.9% of amateur stations lack any real risk of significant RF
> exposure, but now everyone still has to do the analysis and document
> the results.
This necessity WAS our responsibility before perhaps ten years ago, we
got brief relief, but pressure from the "5G is killing us" crowd has
placed pressure on the FCC, so it is back. It was on my general test in
2009.
I was never a general, and that is all I wanted to be.
--
Ron W4BIN - Understanding is much better than
knowing how.MX
More information about the CW
mailing list