[CW] cw statistics

[Radio K0HB]

The RBN analysis is interesting, but might be somewhat skewed because of a characteristic of the skimmer-based RBN system.


Skimmer looks only for stations sending CQ and ignores conversational CW.  Since most operators adjust their speed to accommodate the QSO partner(s) I'd view the reported averages with some skepticism.




73, de Hans, K0HB
🌵Sent from Arizona 🌞

On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Michael Kashuba <wn6yqs at aol.com> wrote:

> very interesting indeed, with appropriate disclaimer no less....
> thank you!
> Mike
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pa0wv <pa0wv at amsat.org>
> To: cw <cw at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Wed, Mar 19, 2014 9:10 am
> Subject: [CW] cw statistics
> interesting data reply #89 and #91
> http://www.eham.net/ehamforum/smf/index.php/topic,89402.75.html
> http://www.eham.net/ehamforum/smf/index.php?ehamsid=6f59ouonua9fou0odu9vu31fk5&topic=89402.90
> Wim  PA0WV 73=30
> ______________________________________________________________
> CW mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:CW at mailman.qth.net
> CW List ARCHIVES: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/cw/
> Unsubcribe send email to cw-subscribe at mailman.qth.net
> Support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> =30=
>  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/cw/attachments/20140319/a65faf11/attachment.html>