[CW] New RadioTelegraph Operator License

Fri Jul 5 19:52:42 EDT 2013

So, how does one prove that one passed the 20-wpm code test for Amateur 
Extra prior to April 15, 2000?
Or, does the FCC verify that information when one passes the written 
elements for the new "T" license?

73 de Jim - AD6CW

On 6/13/2013 9:39 PM, D.J.J. Ring, Jr. wrote:
> Steve Johnson is the ONLY holder of the T type license in the USA.
>
> Surprisingly the FCC has decided to renew the T1 and the T2 licenses 
> but just to make them lifetime!
>
> So there will be three type of Telegraph licenses, the T, the T2 and 
> the T1.
>
> Interesting!
>
> David N1EA
> David J. Ring, Jr., N1EA <http://www.qsl.net/n1ea/> Radio-Officers 
> Group <http://groups.google.com/group/radio-officers?hl=en> -- Join CW 
> email list <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw%20> -- Historic 
> Morse Recordings <http://tiny.cc/n1ea>
> *Gopher Hole:*  gopher://sdf.org/1/users/djringjr/ 
> <gopher://sdf.org/1/users/djringjr/> (native or with Firefox's 
> Overbite extension) or via http to gopher gateway 
> <http://gopher.floodgap.com/gopher/gw?gopher://sdf.org/1/users/djringjr/>
> *C**hat* Skype: djringjrMSN: djringjr (@) msn.com <http://msn.com>AIM: 
> N1EAicq: 27380609
>
> =30=
>
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 2:31 PM, <sbjohnston at aol.com 
> <mailto:sbjohnston at aol.com>> wrote:
>
>     I'm proud to announce that the FCC granted my new RadioTelegraph
>     Operator Licenseyesterday.  It is number T000000001, so I am the
>     very first to receive the new type of radiotelegraph ticket. There
>     doesn't seem to be a T000000002 yet, so apparently I am the *only*
>     holder as well.  -grin- That and $5 will buy me lunch at McDonalds.
>
>     When the FCC announced the new radiotelegraph license structure in
>     January (see below), I asked the FCC's helpdesk what elements
>     would be neededfor me to get the new ticket. They confirmed that
>     applicants for the new Radiotelegraph Operator License would be
>     required to pass written elements 1 and 6, and telegraphy elements
>     1 and 2.  I hold an Amateur Extra class license issued before
>     April 15, 2000, so my passing of that 20 wpm code test would
>     substitute for Telegraphy Elements 1 and 2.  I also hold a General
>     Radiotelephone Operator License(was originally a First-Phone), so
>     that would cover written element 1.  That left me only needing to
>     take the exam for written element 6.
>
>     ETA was the only COLEM (the commercial equivalent of volunteer
>     examiners)that responded to my email inquiries - none of the
>     others even bothered to reply. It took me three months to work out
>     with ETA how to take the exam. Their examinersbased at a nearby
>     college apparentlyvanished without notice, and thus there was a
>     lot of dead-end emailing and back-n-forth discussion. ETA finally
>     offered the optionto have a local library proctor the exam. I made
>     all the library arrangements and took the exam a couple weeks
>     ago.  In just a few days ETA let me know I'd passed. Then last
>     week they told me they needed two signed passport photos for the
>     application. Fortunately I got their message when I was having
>     lunch next door to a Walgreens that takes such photos, near a post
>     office where I could mail them to ETA, all done in a half-hour or
>     so.  ETAapparently received the pictures in time to submit my
>     application on the first day theCommission was able to acceptthem,
>     May 20.
>
>     With the demise of commercialmaritime CW, there is little
>     practical use for a radiotelegraph ticket.  Except for
>     museum-ships and historical club shore stations, there is little
>     commercial Morse to be heard on the"ship-to-shore" bands. Why
>     bother with a new version of an antique license?  Iappreciated the
>     challenge of studying for aserious exam covering technology from a
>     very wide time range- 1920s to 2000s, and I'd like to be able to
>     operate one of the restored maritime stations some day.
>
>     "Why do you want to climb Mount Everest?" George Mallory is
>     famously quoted as having replied, "Because it's there".   It is
>     unlikely I will climb Mount Everest, but I can always learn more
>     about radio and electronics.
>
>     73   Steve WD8DAS
>
>     sbjohnston at aol.com <mailto:sbjohnston at aol.com>
>     http://www.wd8das.net/
>     --------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Radio is your best entertainment value.
>     --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>     - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>     Changes to FCC Radiotelegraph Operator Licenses Coming May 20
>
>     *Effective May 20, 2013*
>     <http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2013/db0419/DA-13-798A1.pdf>,
>     the FCC will no longer accept applications for First (T1), Second
>     (T2) or Third Class (T3) Radiotelegraph Operator Certificates. In
>     addition, the FCC has consolidated the T1 and T2 Radiotelegraph
>     Operator Certificates into a new license class called the
>     Radiotelegraph Operator License (T). According to the FCC, this
>     change takes effect upon renewal: T1s and T2s that are renewed on
>     or after May 20, 2013 will be renewed as Ts, but existing T1s and
>     T2s will retain their current license class for the duration of
>     the current license term. The Commission also consolidated the T3
>     with Marine Radio Operator Permits (MP); T3s renewed on or after
>     May 20, 2013 will be renewed as MPs, but existing T3s will retain
>     their current license class for the duration of the current
>     license term. These new rules were first announced in a /Report
>     and Order/ (*WT Docket No. 10-177*
>     <http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022100656>), issued
>     January 8, 2013.
>     - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
>
>
>
>
>     ______________________________________________________________
>     CW mailing list
>     Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw
>     Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>     Post: mailto:CW at mailman.qth.net <mailto:CW at mailman.qth.net>
>     CW List ARCHIVES: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/cw/
>
>     This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>     Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>     =30=
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> CW mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:CW at mailman.qth.net
> CW List ARCHIVES: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/cw/
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> =30=

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/cw/attachments/20130705/95cc7ba3/attachment-0001.html>