[CW] Thinking about tubes
Fernando Quinones
n2fq at sbcglobal.net
Fri Apr 24 12:24:24 EDT 2009
Your are absolutely right that their
are a plethora of cw signals during those periods.
I'm not a contester so my thinking was
that perhaps a tube radio wouldn't be
ideal under those circumstances.
My brain was thinking that he wanted
a tube radio for nostalgic reasons and
to play with.
My bad. No further comments needed,
I stand correct.
73
On Apr 23, 2009, at 5:12 PM, K0HB wrote:
>
>>
>> Also, not too many CW ops on the air nowadays, so
>> tight filters are not really needed.
>>
>
> You're joking, right?
>
> In my experience the amount of CW activity is increasing.
>
> I just noticed that for last years CQWWDX contest they set a record
> for
> number of log entries, and for the first time ever the number of CW
> logs
> exceeded the number of Phone logs.
>
> Better filters have never been more important.
>
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
> "Just a boy and his radio"
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> CW mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:CW at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Fernando N2FQ
<http://pages.sbcglobal.net/n2fq>
More information about the CW
mailing list