[CW] Re: ARRL

[Steve-W0OOW]

Well, I did not post to the 11m amps group, have been an ARRL member for 40+
years, and resent the way things are handled.  They appear to represent
their own agenda and not the hams they purport to represent.  They have
failed miserably to represent CW, yet the majority of hams use CW at least
part timeaccording to the ARRL's own surveys.  By the ARRL's own data there
would be a speed limit imposed on CW using the human ear if "their"
bandwidth proposal were to go through.  I am one dissatisfied customer.
When I first started in 1959 I couldn't wait to become an ARRL member.  Now,
it is diluted.  What ever happened to "of, by, and for the radio amateur"?
Steve W0OOW

> And you posted to the 11m amps group?  Then you complain about the ARRL.
>
> W8OKN