[CW] CQ Mag vs QST and CW
john
[email protected]
Tue, 03 Feb 2004 20:06:54 -0500
Well, even if the ARRL fails to represent it's membership
and ignores all it's previous polling re: CW, it's interesting
to see that CQ magazine actually publishes the results of its
poll this month (do you hear that, Mr Haynie?) and it too,
shows strong support for CW. Isn't that fascinating.
I demanded (and supposedly got) my membership fee refunded
as of 2 weeks ago. Tho CQ is not any more supportive of CW
the QST, they're a hell of a lot more honest. They'll get my subscription
money, not the ARRL.
John K5MO
---
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.573 / Virus Database: 363 - Release Date: 1/28/04
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/mixed
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/plain (text body -- kept)
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed. To learn how
to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html ---