[CW] Intro & Question....

Fri, 16 May 2003 02:04:50 -0400

Hi all:

   Actually this configuration has all of the advantages.
I have a one or two letter name entry for each list I am
on in my address book, to reply to the cw list server
(reflector) I press reply and remove the last senders
name and replace it with a ` c '. I have all lists and
no individual members in my address book.
   I do send private E-grams to some folks that are irrelevant
to the general membership, if I were denied this, I would go
elsewhere.
   I find there is a lot less ranging and pasting required this way.

   Ron  73

>>>BTW, does anyone know why the list seems to be misconfigured?  The
>>>reply-to address isn't being set to [email protected].

>>Try "reply to all" in your mail programm and delete the email of the sender.

> Oh, that's what I do, but it screams "misconfigured" with out the reply-to
> set. ;)
-- 
        73 (= Best Regards) de: Ron [email protected]
     100% Slack. since July, 1997 (still free!) SENT D&T are UTC
        Visit my HAM Web SITE at: http://www.qsl.net/ka4inm