[CW] future of CW

Sat, 2 Aug 2003 06:55:20 -0400

Greg and others:

I found out where the source of missinformation about the "ban" of CW on
MARS frequencies comes from.

I should have known - it is from NO CODE INTERNATIONAL.  They're employing
the same communist-inspired tactics that are being used to twist other
things in our society around, and (to them) hopefully off their foundation:
the violence of the lie.

Here, gentlemen, is where the enemy reveals himself for who he is:
http://www.nocode.org/articles/mars.html

The ONLY one who is saying that code has been banned is NCI.  Read the
message, MARS says that they've retired the use of morse.

Has morse been banned from MARS repeaters for identification, if it has, or
if ALL MARS repeaters "just happen" to identify by voice, then I think there
strong indications of a plan of action that goes back to about 1975, and has
systematically ridiculed the use of CW and made it as meaningless as
possible?

To what purpose?  To destroy our society?  There are other indications that
people using the same methods are doing this for other areas of attack.
Twist societies memory about something with lies for so long, and then try
to re-write history.

If I were trying to take over the USA, this is what I'd do:

Undermine and Destroy the following:
The emergency communications (non-government) of the country.
The ability of the countrymen to defend themselves if need be - gun control.
The social order, so that the people no longer know right from wrong.
"Engineer" the language so that words no longer have the deep philosophican
and theological harmonics.
Take over the school systems, Take over the news distribution systems.
Change "good" things into "evil" things by re-education via the
communications we control.

Violence was once a word given great meaning, from the intent to willfully
misinterpret words (violence to a translation), to the sheer force of sudden
weather (violent storm).

Today's meaning does not include the "LIE", where 30 years ago the meaning
did.

"They" use this method because it is "legal" and now in this country, moral
no longer worthy of any meaning, our Supreme Court has said so.

The NAZI's killing of the innocents was legal in Germany - Nurenberg Trial
held them accountable to the laws of "Nature".  But modern science has said
that nature is the result of randomness, that there is no Author of Nature's
law.

The violence of the lie is now legal, and we are defenseless against it.  If
fact, we can't even SEE the lies any more.

Something to think about.

73

DR

73

DR

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gregory W. Moore" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Cc: "cw" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: [CW] future of CW

> GA all,
>
> CW was never "outlawed".  What happened, and rather predictably, was
> that when the Military ceased using CW, the same thing happened in
> MARS.  No surprises here.  The rate changed, no more RM's, and the whole
> comm business turned into satcom links and internet.  Hey, I'm a former
> RM, Speed Key Certificate CLF-23, and don't like where this has gone one
> bit, but one service simply followed the lead of another.  With the
> quirky propagation conditions we have been having this year, there have
> been times when CW would have worked when nothing else would, but, one
> lives with the regs.
>
> Spark transmissions are illegal because of the inherent wide (huge)
> bandwidth of the damped wave. Just for a good example here, I believe
> everyone has seen the effects of only one car with a bad spark plug
> lead.  One will hear this on just about any freq imaginable, on the TV
> (any channel) and even in some computer monitors.  Now, the amount of
> radiated power from a bad ignition cable is miniscule compared to any
> spark rig.  I believe that it is rather easy to see why spark is not
> permitted, as it would create widespread, uncontrolled, interference to
> any number of services.
>
> I don't see CW being outlawed on HF, or any other bands for that matter.
> There is nothing "clandestine" about it, any more than there is
> something "clandestine" about say MT-63, or PSK, or RTTY.
>
> Personally, I want to see the requirement for morse kept in the
> licencing process simply to keep the tradition alive, but regardless of
> if it is included, or not, there are still going to be supporters, and
> still going to be those who pass on the tradition to a new generation of
> hams.  Every change that we have had  has always caused loads of
> debate,  but the Amateur Service has always kept going.
>
> This is IMHO, only, but I don't see an "outlawed" CW mode of operation.
> Heck, look at it this way, CW is just slow (by comparison with other
> modes) digital operation. It makes no difference if the transmitting
> station and recieving stations are using organic computers or silicon
> based computers --hi--.
>
> 73 es ZUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> de Greg Moore WA3IVX / NNN0BVN
>
>
>
> Ronald KA4INM Youvan wrote:
>
> >>  I have been enjoying this discussion about the future of CW.
> >>  I cannot see why cw would be made an illegal mode like spark
> >
> >
> >   We can't understand why US MARS outlawed cw when it quit
> > using it on it's nets.
>
>
> --
> "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do
nothing."
>                                                    --Edmund Burke
>
> Greg Moore NNN0BVN PA
> U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Military Affiliate Radio System (MARS)
> Official Pennsylvania Area Website:
> http://pages.prodigy.net/nnn0fbk/mars.htm
> Official Northeast Area Website:
> http://www.navymars.org/northeast/index.htm
> Navy-Marine Corps MARS: Proudly Serving Those Who Serve."
> E-Mail (MARS) [email protected]
>
****************************************************************************
****************************
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CW mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw