[CW] Re: Refarming the CW Dude Ranch

[David J Ring Jr]

Jim,

I think you're right -- even if it is reserved for new modes of communications - something as 
basic as CW should be allowed - even if it isn't fostered.

All amateur bands should permit CW.

73

David Ring


On 19 Apr 2002 at 18:21, N2EY@aol.com wrote:
 
I agree with most of what Hans proposes:

1) The 'phone bands should stay as they are
2) All hams who have passed a code test should have at least General class CW
    privileges (spectrum, not power).
3) There should be HF spectrum for experimentation with new modes without 
being
     hamstrung by limitations on symbol rate or occupied bandwidth.

But note that his proposal would prohibit CW in those subbands. I don't think 
that's a good idea.

73 de Jim, N2EY
> 
> In a message dated 4/19/02 2:21:38 AM Eastern Daylight Time, n1ea@arrl.net 
> writes:
> 
> > You really got this one right - you've done more good with this than ARRL 
> (I  am  not anit-ARRL -- because it is US) and the rest of ham-dom combined.
>  I am simply delighted with this proposal.it helps the techs and novices who 
> WANT to operate CW but are really frustrated with the QRM on 40 meters, or 
> maybe with even finding a contact in the old Novice Reservation.
>  
>  But - wait it gets better - instead of old tech SSB - (flatuence with a 
> face)  - you  charge ahead to the evolving communications techniques.


Hans K-zero-HB wrote about his proposal for