[CTSARA] And Still Another Interesting Field Day Statistic

[Stan Rothman]

Hello,
I really must question going to 4A for field day. One reason we did so well 
this year was because we had enough operators. We could have used more 
during the quiet hours. Would we have enough to keep another station going 
for 24 hours?
We could query the membership as it gets closer next year. A little early to 
think about it now
Stan WA2NRV


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jonathan Solomon" <jonstv at gmail.com>
To: "Andrew Siegel" <andrew at siegel.org>
Cc: <ctsara at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 5:31 PM
Subject: Re: [CTSARA] And Still Another Interesting Field Day Statistic


Perhaps a club class?

On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Andrew Siegel <andrew at siegel.org> wrote:
> Before we jump to 4A, remember that there are a lot of opportunities
> to get on the air in the CW tent. We are likely going to lose Neil
> (KX2Y), our guest operator this year, so we could really use some CW
> ops. Otherwise it's just Leonid and me. I would be happy to work
> with anyone who wants to learn CW or to build up their speed.
>
> --... ...--
> Andy, N2CN
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 10:07 AM, O'Connor, Tony
> <tony.o'connor at credit-suisse.com> wrote:
>> Well, if we go 4A next year, we can put more people on the air and 
>> *increase* our overall number of QSO's, right?
>>
>> 73,
>> Tony
>> KB1SUN
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: ctsara-bounces at mailman.qth.net <ctsara-bounces at mailman.qth.net>
>> To: Stamford Amateur Radio Association <ctsara at mailman.qth.net>
>> Sent: Fri Jul 02 08:58:26 2010
>> Subject: [CTSARA] And Still Another Interesting Field Day Statistic
>>
>> I was looking at the number of operators we had in the three HF tents 
>> (i.e., not including GOTA and not including VHF).
>> We had a total of four more operators this year than last year. This year 
>> we had a record 18 different operators on the air from the HF tents 
>> versus 14 different operators last year. In fact, six of the people who 
>> operated in the HF tents this year were not in our logs from last year or 
>> the year before.
>> Despite that -- or maybe because of that -- we wound up with club record 
>> numbers of QSOs on phone and on CW.
>> I suspect it's "because of" since it meant that we always had fresh (or 
>> relatively fresh) people on the air For example, this year we were able 
>> to make a good run right to the end, as opposed to last year when our 
>> production dropped off after about 1:15pm.
>> I understand that there are a few people who would have liked to have 
>> operated this year who didn't -- mostly because they were concerned about 
>> impacting our QSO counts. Next year you folks WILL get on the air!!!!
>> JonKB1QBZ
>> P.S. Let's keep this our little secret and not tell Terry that we know, 
>> but Terry's admitted that he's willing to see our QSO counts go down if 
>> it means more club members get on the air. And keep that quiet, Terry may 
>> be listening and we don't want him to know that we know.
> ______________________________________________________________
> CTSARA mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ctsara
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:CTSARA at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
______________________________________________________________
CTSARA mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ctsara
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:CTSARA at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html