[Central-Electronics] 100V or 200V?

[Robert Nickels]

On 4/1/2014 9:23 PM, W2HX wrote:
> What about the "rarity" part of this? 1500 100v's vs 500 200v's? Also I hear the 200V is easier to work on.
Eugene,

I just  happened to be looking at Nick Tusa's excellent webpage and will 
just pass along what he says about this:
---
A total of fifteen hundred 100Vs and five hundred 200Vs were 
manufactured. Due to their limited product and relatively high price 
($800 in 1959) few were ever scrapped and most survive, today.
---
> Also, could you enumerate the missing features? What I've found is the meter doesn't have RF amps or LINE voltage capabilities.  What else does it lack?
Best I've been able to tell (I don't have a 200V) the main external 
difference is the removal of the lever switches to the right and left of 
the main tuning knob on the 200V.   These allow the choice of voice or 
carrier for calibration (which I like) and the added metering (line 
volts and PA current in addition to watts). Internally, the 200V uses 
solid state rectifiers and has a little different tube line up, but the 
same driver and finals.   I've been all through the 100V and found it 
quite easy to work on - it's clear that CE went to extra lengths to 
facilitate troubleshooting and modularity.    Just comparing the two 
product brochures the construction looks pretty much identical, but 
maybe Nick or someone can jump in if I"m missing something.

Of course some collectors will probably pay more for the 200V just 
because only 1/3 as many were made!

73, Bob W9RAN


Of course there are collectors who might pay more for the 200V due to 
rarity,