[Central-Electronics] 100V or 200V?

[W2HX]

Thanks, Bob. What about the "rarity" part of this? 1500 100v's vs 500 200v's? Also I hear the 200V is easier to work on.

Also, could you enumerate the missing features? What I've found is the meter doesn't have RF amps or LINE voltage capabilities.  What else does it lack?
thanks

73 Eugene W2HX


-----Original Message-----
From: central-electronics-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:central-electronics-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Robert Nickels
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 10:19 PM
To: central-electronics at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Central-Electronics] 100V or 200V?

On 4/1/2014 7:16 PM, W2HX wrote:
> Ok folks, assuming they are working equally well, which to keep?
Hi Eugene,

Gosh, such a horrible problem to have!

Since the 200V was produced as an attempt to cost-reduce the 100V under the eye of the Zenith beancounters, and lacks a couple of features, I 
think I'd go with the 100V all other things being equal.   Of course I 
usually like the first book or movie better than the sequel ;-)

73, Bob W9RAN
______________________________________________________________
Central-Electronics mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/central-electronics
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Central-Electronics at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html