[Boatanchors] =The_SSSOBs_Inspire_Me_Again?

[David Harmon]

Alex.....why didn't you say anything about those SS stations that have set
their transmit bandwidth intentionally wide?
There are a lot more of those guys that are far too wide than AM stations!


73

David Harmon
K6XYZ
Sperry, OK


-----Original Message-----
From: Boatanchors [mailto:boatanchors-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of
Radio AI2Q
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 9:23 AM
To: w5jo at brightok.net
Cc: Boat Anchors List <boatanchors at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: Re: [Boatanchors] =The_SSSOBs_Inspire_Me_Again?

Watching my spectrum analyzer that samples at 255 Msample/sec with 16-bit
output, I see many AM stations on 80 meters occupying 20-kHz of bandwidth. 
Of course both sidebands are identical and carry the same information!

BTW, I occasionally run a Viking Valiant and HQ-180 on AM.

Vy 73, AI2Q, Alex
Member: ARRL, FOC, RSGB, CWops, QRP-L, Antique Wireless Association, the
Southern Maine Area Amateur Radio Team (formerly the New England Radio
Discussion Society), DXCC Honor Roll, 16ØM DXCC, 8ØM DXCC http://ai2q.org




----- Original Message -----
From: <w5jo at brightok.net>
Cc: "Boat Anchors List" <boatanchors at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 8:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Boatanchors] =The_SSSOBs_Inspire_Me_Again?


>I believe the aggravation is really about the SSB stations who center on 
>3.892 just in the passband of our receivers and run maximum power.  Or 
>those who zero beat the AM carrier and run a lot of power, the same bunch 
>does that from time to time.  I hear SSB stations regularly drop in between

>two AM QSOs  that are on 3.880 and 3.885.  Then there is the "traffic" net 
>that is on 3.878 or so that is near me.  This "net" is associated with the 
>40 meter "net" that gave Bill W8VYZ so much trouble.
>
> They always appear when the AM QSO has been going on for a while so, it 
> appears, that they need to learn respect.  Why should AM stations, who 
> have been operating for a time before the SSB stations appear, move to 
> accommodate them?
>
> I would support the FCC establishing a quasi government/civilian 
> organization to help enforce the rules.  It sure seems the FCC doesn't 
> care.
>
> Jim
> W5JO
>
> -----Original Message----- 
>
> It's important to spread out as Pete says.   Ditch this "AM Window"
> concept and spread out.  We need folks operating down below 3650
> especially because ARRL wants to take that away and have FCC make it a
> part of the no-phone CW 80 meter band.
>
>
> 73
>
> Rob
> K5UJ
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Boatanchors mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Boatanchors at mailman.qth.net
>
> List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
> ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **
>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to ai2q at roadrunner.com
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2016.0.7539 / Virus Database: 4563/12099 - Release Date: 04/25/16
> 

______________________________________________________________
Boatanchors mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Boatanchors at mailman.qth.net

List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **


This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to k6xyz at sbcglobal.net