[Boatanchors] SWAN

[jbrannig]

I had an EICO seven "drifty-three"It was said that the only way to keep it on frequency was to drive a nail through the tuning knob
Jim


Sent from my Galaxy Tab® A-------- Original message --------From: Brad Farrell <bradk4rt at verizon.net> Date: 10/28/2015  3:25 AM  (GMT-05:00) To: boatanchors at mailman.qth.net Subject: [Boatanchors] SWAN 
I've had a Swan 500CX for several years.   The web site at http://www.angelfire.com/ny2/hamradio/ is the only site devoted to Swan gear that I know of, and the Yahoo group has been active for several years.  

W4BYG is correct.  Really, in the 1960s and at least early 70s what ham who had a modern rig wasn't touching up their VFO during a QSO? 

Perhaps two or three years ago, I heard former Swan employee Stu K4BOV, who runs the Swan Tech Net on 40 meters, discussing drifting VFOs during a net.  As I recall, Stu said the 350 VFO was a problem Herb Johnson took very seriously and something Swan devoted considerable effort to trying to resolve, although I believe Stu indicated that Swan was never able to resolve the problem to its complete satisfaction.  I stand to be corrected by Stu, of course.

Brad K4RT

Ray, W4BYG w4byg at att.net 
 Tue Oct 27 19:20:43 EDT 2015 
Previous message (by thread): [Boatanchors] SWAN
Next message (by thread): [Boatanchors] SWAN
 Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] To be fair, in the days of tube VFO's and receiver oscillators, almost all radios made only for the ham market drifted, Some worse than others, but most of them necessitated you retune several times throughout a QSO.(You really haven't had a QSO in ham radio until you followed a Heathkit DX-100 with the Cuban chirp, all over the 20 meter CW band).The tubes generated heat which over time changed the ambient temperatures within the chassis and therefore the L-C circuits, etc.For most who couldn't afford the most expensive commercial class gear, they had to live with it.Ray, 62 years and counting as W4BYGOn 10/27/2015 6:55 PM, Ken Kaplan wrote:> Funny story. Did the company (Swan) ever try to resolve this issue? > They ignore it until "they" went away? They didn't accept it as truth? > Just recommend short QSO's?> Just curious.> 73 Ken kb7rgg>> On 10/27/2015 12:49 PM, D C _Mac_ Macdonald wrote:>> The Swan 350 EARNED
  the epithet "Three Drifty!">>>> * * * * * * * * * * *>> * 73 - Mac, K2GKK/5 *>> * (Since 30 Nov 53) *>> * k2gkk hotmail com *>> * Oklahoma City, OK *>> * USAF & FAA (Ret.) *>> * * * * * * * * * * *>>>> On Oct 27, 2015, at 2:55 PM, Glen Zook <gzook at yahoo.com> wrote:>>>>>>>> Just remember the age old question: On what frequency does the >>>> Swan users group meet?>>>>>>>> Answer: Pick any frequency in the phone segment of the band >>>> because the group will drift by in a very short period of time!>>>>>>>> Glen, K9STH Website: http://k9sth.net
______________________________________________________________
Boatanchors mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Boatanchors at mailman.qth.net

List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **


This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to jbrannig at verizon.net