[Boatanchors] AR 88 Discussions
Richard Knoppow
1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com
Sun Feb 2 20:50:50 EST 2014
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Johnson" <mvjohn at sympatico.ca>
To: "Boatanchor List" <Boatanchors at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2014 2:57 PM
Subject: [Boatanchors] AR 88 Discussions
> Team,
I may be able to give you some hints. I finished
rebuilding an AR-88F recently but am still detailing it. I
avoided removing the gear box but think will have to in
order to get it as smooth as I think it should be.
The F version has some differences from the A and D
versions. It was designed to be part of the DR-89 diversity
receiver. This consists of three AR-88F receivers along with
the combiner, tone keyer and monitoring units. The
receivers are somewhat modified for use in this system. I
think the most important modification is to the AVC system.
The first and third IF amplifiers are connected so that
their cathodes return through a 5K pot located on the front
panel and used to trim the gain so that none of the
receivers dominates the diversity combiner. In addition the
fixed bias on the second IF is changed by going to the gain
pot through a 15 ohm resistor and bypass capacitor. In
standard receivers this cathode is returned to ground
through a 150 ohm resistor which is unbypassed. The reason
is to provide some feedback to compensate for any Miller
effect detuning of the IF transformer. Another change is
the application of a small amount of positive bias to the
AVC buss to reduce the AVC delay. On normal receivers the
minimum voltage on the bias line is about 1.8 volts. This is
reduced to around 1.0 volt with the modification. I am not
sure of the reason for this change. My guesses are that it
makes the diversity switching more sensitive. It also lowers
the noise level of the receiver very slightly. I have
removed these modifications on my receiver because my
measurements show they make overloading more likely.
However, they can very easily be reinstalled. I also shorted
the trimmer pot because I kept bumping it. It has no
function on a stand alone receiver. The line to the trimmer
is made from the line that was originally intended to go the
a signal strength meter. I was able to obtain a meter and
installed it.
The IF can be aligned without a sweeper. There are
fairly complete instructions in the British versions of the
AR-88 manuals as well as in the CR-88 manual. The key is to
do each of the overcoupled stages separately. The four
transformers are first peaked at the crystal frequency while
in the No.2 position. Then put the selectivity in No.1 and
investigate the peaks using a counter on the generator. One
will be quite a bit larger than the other. Peak this, it
will not come up to the first peaks amplitude. Now, measure
the exact separation of the two peaks, it should be exactly
12 khz. If not go back the larger one, set the generator
exactly 6 khz from the established center frequency (the
crystal filter frequency) and peak it. Then go exactly 12
khz to the other side and peak that. You will find that it
takes several alternations to get the two peaks to be
exactly the same amplitude and exactly 12 khz apart. After
this check in position 2, you should get two peaks of the
same amplitude by separated by about 7 khz.
The remaining IF transformers are not overcoupled and
can be just peaked on the center frequency. Once all are
peaked properly you should be able to see a relatively flat
topped response in position No.1 which is about 12 khz wide
at the corners and about 16 khz wide at the 6db down points.
I used a Hewlett-Packard 606-A coupled using scope probe
as the source and a Hewlett-Packard 400H VTVM with a scope
probe as the detector. Of course I am reading RF and not DC
but it makes no difference. On one stage I was getting a
rapid variation, not sure what was causing this.
Now, more.
The dial calibration of my receiver also is off in the
mid range. The spec is 0.5% and it does easily meet the spec
but I am suspicious that the tuning capacitors are not quite
centered even though they _look_ centered. For one thing
they are stiffer than I think they should be.
The method of checking centering, assuming no plate
bending has been done, is to set the cap for maximum
capacitance and adjust the bearing for _minimum_
capacitance. Because the capacitance is proportional to the
inverse of the spacing it is not a linear function. If you
think about it as the plates of the rotor are moved toward
the plates of the stator the closer side will increase
capacitance faster than the further plates lose it. So, the
minimum is when they are exactly centered. I have not done
this yet on this receiver but have done it to others. The
AR-88 has two sections of variable capacitor; one is for the
oscillator and mixer stage, the other for the two RF stages.
The oscillator should be easy to do by listening to a
frequency at the low end of band three or four. The RF
section will take some other method. I am going to see if I
get a sufficient indication using a grid dip meter to do the
adjustment.
If my suspicions are correct the result of the centering
error will be that when the ends are set correctly the
center will read low which is what I get. The cap on my
receiver has inspection or lock paint on the bearings of
both sections and on the screws securing the frame so its
possible its just as good as it can get. The stiffness
bothers me.
The AR-88 is an exceptional receiver. It has quite low
noise level, very good sensitivity right up to 30 mhz due, I
think to very low loss coils and good RF tubes, it is
astonishingly stable, all the tuned circuits have
temperature compensating ceramic caps.
The receiver was designed without any electrolytic caps
and except for the headphone jack, meter on sets which have
them, and the gain trim pot on the F nothing is mounted
directly on the front panel. The bare chassis weighs about
80 lbs and a receiver in a desk cabinet weighs about 100
lbs. The bypass caps are oil filled paper in tubs. Most of
these have degraded seals and have leaked oil. Be careful,
the oil may be a pcb. I have had no success in restuffing
caps so replaced mine with film caps mounted on terminal
strips using the hardware from the old caps. The RF
compartment may have Micamold or Solar paper caps. These
look like mica caps but are not and will be bad. Replace
them with film or ceramic caps. Some early AR-88s have
lozenge shaped caps of an odd pink-violet color. AFAIK,
these are RCA made mica caps (not silver mica but stacked
mica) and are probably still good. I think mica was in short
supply during WW-2 and so the paper caps were used.
The audio amp is single ended by has enough feedback
around it to keep the distortion low.
There is a great deal of information on the AR-88 and its
relatives at the Western Historic Radio Museum site. Some
of the handbooks are at BAMA but look under the military
category as well as RCA. Again these are outstanding
receivers and worth a lot of work to make right.
I am typing off the top of my head and have probably
forgotten something.
--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
dickburk at ix.netcom.com
More information about the Boatanchors
mailing list