[Boatanchors] ID'ing an AR-88 Variant
Richard Knoppow
1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com
Tue Nov 19 19:22:12 EST 2013
-----Original Message-----
>From: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo at gmail.com>
>Sent: Nov 19, 2013 11:15 AM
>To: Doug Hensley <w5jv at hotmail.com>
>Cc: "boatanchors mailman.qth.net" <boatanchors at mailman.qth.net>, "rca at mailman.qth.net" <rca at mailman.qth.net>
>Subject: Re: [Boatanchors] ID'ing an AR-88 Variant
>
>They are beautiful receivers, the one you ask about is the CR-88. I
>just bought one at the Ft. Wayne hamfest on Saturday and paid $425 for
>mine.
>
>The build quality and performance to me are breath taking. But, I had
>to have help moving it. MIne was in very good condition. I have
>wanted one for a long time but always before they were for sale at a
>distant location. Shipping it would practically demand a crate.
>That's how they were originally shipped. It could well be the
>heaviest receiver out there at 98 lbs. The cabinet weighs almost 20
>pounds alone. The SP400 may beat it if you count the set and separate
>power supply together.
>
>More here: http://www.radioblvd.com/ar88.htm
>
>73
>
>Rob
>K5UJ
The above is about the best source of info on the AR-88 and its variations. As far as I can find out no AR-88s or versions of it were sold commercially although the DR-89 is shown in RCA catalogues. There was also no published price. Estimates are that they must of cost on the order of $500 to $1000. The most expensive receiver c.1940 was the Hammarlund Super-Pro although an HRO in a rack with all accessories was close. This was still under about $500.
There are some puzzles about the AR-88: one is the lack of a dial band indicator but I think that may have been due to getting them into production in war-time. Another is the type of crystal filter that was used but here I think it was the patent situation. The best of all of the single crystal filters was the Hammarlund patented one introduced in the HQ-120-X and used in the Super-Pro 200 and later series. The RCA filter stays in tune when changing bandwidths but the phasing control does not do a good job of nulling interference. It was meant for compensating for the crystal mount capacitance and is not balanced the way the Hammerlund filter is. I suspect that if the AR-88 had been released as a normal commercial product it would have gone through some additional refinement before production. Of course, it might never have been made due to the cost.
More information about the Boatanchors
mailing list