[Boatanchors] Upgrade question
Bill Paschall
bill at willydog5.com
Sun Sep 14 17:19:41 EDT 2008
One thing this entire quiestion of CW, yes or no, upgrade ease and who has
the biggest johnson really proves is that we human beings are if anything
predictable. I guess by some standards I am a newbee, first licensed in 66
and now an advanced liscenee. Yes, I did get general before the FCC testers
but baring dishonesty on the part of a volunteer tester whom as I recall had
to be at least one grade higher than the level he was going to test, I doubt
that my test was any more difficult that those faced by conditional
applicants. I can remember even then, there were groups of old timers who
were rallying against conditional liscensees as a dumbing down effort since
they did not have to break in using spark gap or heliography. It seems to
me that if those who are so upset by the removal of CW as a requiremet would
stop carping and break out the old key and actually use some CW we might
quit losing bandspace to other mediums. I was recently talking to an extra
at a hamfest who thought Amateur radio was doomed due to the CW issue, it
turned out he didn't even own a key for his ricebox but he had a heck of a
big amp. While I am on the stump, what about the argument that no one can or
does build anymore, Wrong! people do build , a lot of them, and not just
simple field strength meters and such. They build receivers , transmitters
and transceivers for all modes and complexities, that perform very well
indeed. Many of them are QRP enthusists but a lot of them are QRO guys as
well. They use tubes, transisters, ICs and some chips that weren't even
dreams back in the day. Don't believe me do a google on homebrewing ham
radio and see what you get.
Now the question of entry requirements and general operating ability. Sure
some of the new guys use prowords incorrectly , so do I on occasion. True
some of them have along way to go before they are competent hams but they
have an excuse, they are learning, they met the federal requirements as we
all did. That said it doesn't excuse the oldtimer who is splattering 6 KCs
either side of zero beat and whose hearing is such that he thing he needs a
processor to make himself understood and gets upset when told he is not the
best sounding signal on the air.
All in all, My money is on there not being much difference between now and
1950 as far as hamming goes, same old story , different day.
I relinquish the stump and don my asbestos cape.
73
Bill, WD5DZG
More information about the Boatanchors
mailing list