[Boatanchors] Ebay problems
Robert Nickels
ranickel at comcast.net
Thu Aug 28 12:13:04 EDT 2008
J Forster wrote:
> IMO, the best approach is through the governmental agencies:
>
>
Unless someone can cite a law that's being broken, I don't see that
governmental regulators are likely to get involved in telling a business
how to structure it's terms and conditions. There are too many
examples of comparable situations to even mention...
The operative phrase is "Let the market decide". eBay evolved to be a
one-stop shop for just about everything because in its early years, the
terms and conditions were attractive to private sellers and businesses
or "power sellers" alike. If the new rules mean that's no longer the
case, then private sellers should simply turn to other venues, as has
been mentioned several times on this thread. As collectors and users of
boatanchor radios, we probably don't miss a thing by shopping at a site
that is focused on our interests. The bottom line is - eBay became what
it is because it was the best option for both buyers and sellers when
compared to the next-best alternative. (To be blunt, this meant that
sellers got more money for their stuff on eBay!) The reason for this
was primarily due to the world-wide market exposure that eBay provided.
One could argue that the ham-only classified sites offer the same
exposure, we'll just have to look in more than one place. (Any
programmers out there feel like ginning up a cross-site search tool?)
My guess is there will be a relatively small exodus of sellers from eBay
and that it will continue to be a source for buying and selling items of
interest. Some buyers and sellers will prefer the new terms, after
all. But if other venues including local hamfests become better options
as a result, that's all good IMHO. Just don't expect the government to
tell eBay how to run it's business.
73, Bob W9RAN
More information about the Boatanchors
mailing list