[ARRL-OK] Mustang New Draft Antenna Ordinance Proposal
Jim Wilhite
w5jo at brightok.net
Thu Feb 25 22:02:20 EST 2010
Eddie you are correct, this thing is an abomination. Setback
requirements alone will preclude the erection of almost any tower on a
regular sized city lot. There is no grandfather clause for existing
towers, so will present owners be required to remove them, apply and
re-erect? Normally accommodation would allow a height of 60 rather then
50 ft. as many cities have done. Whose installation engineering
requirements will apply? This thing is full of holes.
What a mess, I hope the ARRL counsel can do something with this bunch.
Jim/W5JO
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eddie Manley" <e_manley at cox.net>
> They have made some very significant changes, but I still do not
> believe
> that it provides an "accommodation" for us and just saying it in the
> ordinance does not accomplish this. All structures still have to have
> a
> permit and this, in my opinion, provides NO accommodation for us. I'm
> sure
> they are going to pass it this time. Will be anxious to see what
> Newington
> has to say about it.
> Eddie - 73
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
>> The City of Mustang has provided the latest draft Antenna Ordinance.
>> It
>> can be reviewed at http://www.noblecountyarc.org The ordinance will
>> be
>> voted on by the Mustang City Council at the Tuesday, March 2nd
>> Meeting,
>> 7:00PM at Mustang Council Chambers. ARRL council has not yet
>> responded to
>> the latest draft proposal. 73 KL7MA
>> ______________________________________________________
>>
More information about the ARRL-OK
mailing list