[ARRL-OK] FCC Extends BPL Filing - Eddie K5EMS
Eddie Manley
jema1 at sbcglobal.net
Fri May 28 17:43:06 EDT 2004
FCC Extends BPL Reply Comments Filing Deadline
NEWINGTON, CT, May 27, 2004--The FCC has extended the deadline to file
reply comments in its broadband over power line (BPL) proceeding, ET
Docket 04-37, from Tuesday, June 1, to Tuesday, June 22. The Commission
released its BPL Notice of Proposed Rule Making
<http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&id_document=6515783486>
(NPRM) February 23, and the initial comment deadline passed May 3. The
FCC acted on a request from the National Antenna Consortium
<http://www.antenna-consortium.org/> and the Amherst Alliance
<http://www.amherstalliance.org/> (NAC/Amherst) for a much longer filing
deadline extension. The NAC/Amherst petition cited the anticipated
release of the National Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA) Phase 2 BPL study in making its request for a
filing delay. The organizations said the FCC was not allowing
stakeholders adequate time to prepare comments to address the two-part
NTIA report on BPL interference. The FCC said the NTIA has indicated
that it will submit comments and a technical appendix in the BPL
proceeding this week. Those submissions are expected to contain key
findings of the Phase 2 report, due to be released later this year.
"We believe that three weeks should provide ample time for review and
analysis of this information, and accordingly grant the extension for
that period," said FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Chief Edmond
J. Thomas, who signed the Order Granting Extension of Time
<http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1552A1.doc>
released May 27. NAC/Amherst had sought to have the FCC postpone the
filing comment deadline until either September 1 or two months after the
public release of the NTIA's Phase 2 study--whichever was later. The FCC
said the groups "presented no specific justification for such a longer
time, nor is one evident to us." The FCC said the additional three weeks
should be "ample time" to respond to the anticipated NTIA submission "as
long as it is filed reasonably close to the anticipated date of May 28.
Noting that its Part 15 rules already permit Access BPL systems and that
its BPL NPRM places additional requirements on BPL systems over and
above what Part 15 already requires, the FCC said to further delay the
proceeding would diminish the Commission's ability to protect licensed
users now occupying the HF spectrum. In addition, the FCC said, a
further extension "would needlessly increase regulatory uncertainty
about this technology's promise to deliver broadband services" to US
consumers.
The FCC Order turned down a request that the FCC reissue in a
substantially more detailed form the provisions of its proposed BPL
rules concerning interference prevention and mitigation and the
enforcement of standards. The FCC said that NAC/Amherst provided no
compelling reason nor did it suggest how the FCC's proposed rules were
insufficiently described.
The FCC does not routinely grant such time extensions, and it denied
earlier petitions, including filings from the ARRL and NAC/Amherst, to
extend the initial comment filing deadline, which was May 3. The League
and others said commenters needed more time to digest the NTIA's Part 1
BPL study
<http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fccfilings/2004/bpl/index.html>,
released April 27.
Earlier this year, FCC Chairman Michael K. Powell turned down a request
by US Rep Greg Walden, W7EQI, to delay further action on the BPL
proceeding until the NTIA study's had been released and stakeholders had
had a chance to evaluate it before commenting.
Connecticut Attorney Don Schellhardt is a co-founder of The Amherst
Alliance and served as its first national coordinator. He's the NAC's
vice president for government relations and membership development and
an associate ARRL member.
For more information on BPL, visit the "Broadband Over Power Line (BPL)
and Amateur Radio" page <http://www.arrl.org/bpl/> on the ARRL Web site.
More information about the ARRL-OK
mailing list