[ARC5] Wow...

MARK DORNEY mkdorney at aol.com
Sat Jul 31 21:56:46 EDT 2021


From what I am gathering from this discussion, the receivers are not the big problem. The transmitters are. 

Mark D. 
WW2RDO

“In matters of style, float with the current. In matters of Principle, stand like a rock. “.   -   Thomas Jefferson 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 31, 2021, at 7:59 PM, Mike Morrow <kk5f at earthlink.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> The RU-17 is the receiver for the RU-17/GF-12 24v command set and thus would never be used with a GP-7.  The GP-7 was normally used with either the 12v RU-18 or 24V RU-19 liaison receiver.
>  
> Mike / KK5F
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Thekan <pfthekan at gmail.com>
> Sent: Jul 31, 2021 6:26 PM
> To: ARC-5 <arc5 at mailman.qth.net>
> Subject: [ARC5] Wow...
> 
> 
> How much more stranger can this get...but now a GP-7 Navy aircraft xmtr that runs on 115vac 800cycle and what is probably a RU-17 Navy rcvr. It looks like the dynamotor for the rcvr is under the GP-7. Controls for tuning the rcvr and GP-7 remote on the dash. So it looks like the driver is the radio op.
> Paul
> N6FEG
>  
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/arc5/attachments/20210731/7892626e/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ARC5 mailing list